更新纪联合新闻#4 挑战神话 Steen-McIntyre OriginsNet.org VanLandingham 第一个美国人

discov-jarmenta-photo-dhiser-fromvsmcintyre-detail-jf.jpg更新世的联合

史前史将改变Chinese characters not visible? 不可看见的汉字?


English Pleistocene Coalition Chinese 更新世的联合  Español Coalición Pleistoceno Japanese 更新世連合 Français Coalition pléistocène
Portuguese Aliança do Pleistocene Deutsch Pleistozän-Koalition Arabic العصر الحديث الأقرب التحالف Pуссkо Плейстоценовая коалиция Korean 홍적세 연합

tn_VSM_Intro[h90].jpg

tn_trench-profile-updateJan08_VanLandingham_GSA_2008_desk_copy.h90.jpg
tn_51+sRk3WgFL._SL500_AA246_PIkin2,BottomRight,-13,34_AA280_SH20_OU01_[h90].jpg







"我未曾递交我的看法整体系统 对人任何党信条什么,
在宗教,在哲学方面,在政治,或者其他事
如果我是可胜任的为我自己认为。"

- Thomas Jefferson, 1789年 -




更新世的联合的成员

有数据富挑战性主流科学议程的研究员

挑战神话
旧石器时代的几何、绘图和语言学

If you believe that early peoples such as Homo erectus and Neanderthals were less intelligent than we are today, then you are placing far too much trust in the objectivity of mainstream science and especially anthropology. Unlike in other fields of science, and due to the less-rigorous nature and weaknesses of its tenets, the anthropology community often withholds from the public any evidence that challenges its core paradigms resulting in public perceptions that are by no means accurate. On this page (The Graphics of Bilzingsleben, in lieu of the forthcoming page), you can learn the story of how empirical and unequivocal geometric data challenging a cherished paradigm and presented in a mainstream forum has been held back from publication by the European, Australian, and U. S. scientific communities. Learn how this data (held back since 2006) demonstrates beyond any doubt that there has been no change whatsoever in human cognitive ability for at least 400,000 years.
tn_feliks2006-2007-graphics-of-bilzingsleben-w.permissions.jpg
Steen-McIntyre 人们是在新的世界250,000年

If you are absolutely convinced that people first arrived in the Americas a mere 15-30 thousand years ago, this is because you have been spoon-fed by an institution that will not allow you to see conflicting data. When scientific institutions withhold empirical data in order to promote a single belief system they can manipulate a trusting public into believing whatever paradigm they wish to impose upon them. Those who trust the institutions but do not investigate the evidence themselves are easily prodded along.
On this website you can view actual archaeological data straight from a tephrochronologist (volcanic ash expert, Ph.D). Re-claim your ability to think for yourself. Go beyond what you read on blogs or watch on standard science programs and be prepared to question what you have long been taught regarding the peopling of the Americas. (This website is under construction. However, much of the data on the archaeological sites can be viewed temporarily on the Valsequillo and Hueyatlaco forums of the website.)
VSM_Intro.jpg
OriginsNet.org 艺术和宗教从起点

The website of James B. Harrod, Ph.D. Do you have a picture of early peoples such as Homo erectus or Neanderthals as just barely intelligent enough to walk around or throw a few spears? Is your picture one in which early peoples spend their entire lives in little more than a desperate struggle for survival without stories
or philosophies? On this website you can learn through images of actual artifacts how the archaeological evidence for early art, myth and religion is both immense and vast. If you are prepared to think in 3D and enter into the spiritual and philosophical minds of early people, then it is time to look beyond the mundane interpretations of artifacts so long promoted by mainstream science and realize with confidence what you probably already intuitively knew - that human beings have always thought and felt deeply about their world.
tn_J.Harrod's.image-1231330935.gif
VanLandingham 当它的规范被质询时,主流科学跑

Scientists absorbed in the long-unquestioned paradigm that Homo erectus never made it to the New World may tell you to steer clear of "fringe" ideas. They often do whatever it takes to make certain that you, as a consumer of science, are left to know of only one perspective in regards how American archaeological sites are dated and when early peoples first appeared in the Americas. Often, they have provided dates for artifacts and even human remains specially-tailored to fit the preconceived notion that only modern Homo sapiens made it to the New World. See where this is heading? Rest assured, these scientists are now running scared in the face of hard-fast data. Here you can read the actual reports
from one of the world's leading diatomists, Ph.D (reports these scientists would rather you didn't have access to) demonstrating beyond any reasonable doubt that archaic people were in the Americas 80-400 thousand years ago.
tn_trench-profile-updateJan08_VanLandingham_GSA_2008_desk_copy.jpg
第一个美国人 科学可能有时压制什么它不了解

This website is based on the comprehensive volume by archaeologist, Christopher Hardaker, detailing the entire story of how a whole generation of science readers have been deliberately steered away from data that might confuse them regarding the aggressively-promoted paradigm of no-early-peoples in the Americas. Are you, as an objective thinker, concerned by those attempting to do your thinking for you? You should be. Hardaker's page also features updates on an American archaeological site deemed invalid by promoters of the above-mentioned paradigm though one taken seriously by famed anthropologist Louis Leakey. All in all, it is the data that matter. Rather than allowing yourself to be prodded along, take a look at the data and think for yourself. Keep in mind that if one piece of data (e.g., VanLandingham diatoms) establishes the reality of even a single early site, then the entire New World frontier will change in an instant. 
51+sRk3WgFL._SL500_AA246_PIkin2,BottomRight,-13,34_AA280_SH20_OU01_.jpg




加入我们!

开始探索人的史前史从是准确的科学地和适当地赞美的往世界的早期的人民的一个更加平衡的方面。


时 然后这意味着您属于与我们!




Ishtar's 门
英国

"Not only did our ancestors exist at a much earlier time than we originally thought, we are coming to understand that they were extremely intelligent and in touch with a greater and deeper spiritual reality than the limited viewpoint that we are left with today." DISCUSSION FORUM
tn_liongate2.jpg
Alan Cannell 巴西

International civil engineer and author of "Throwing behaviour and the mass distribution of geological hand samples, hand grenades and Olduvian manuports" currently investigating the deep roots of aesthetic design.
tn_fig3p4-cannell-2002jas.jpg
旧石器时代的照相机理论 美国

The website of Matt Gatton. "Harsh climates in the Paleolithic era forced humans and their predecessors to adopt heat-retaining dwelling strategies, including the use of hide tents in cave mouths, under rock overhangs, and in the open. Small random holes in these hide tents would have coincidentally and occasionally formed camera obscuras, projecting moving images inside the dwelling spaces. These ghostly images carried with them spiritual, philosophical, and aesthetic implications."
tn_htopsequ.jpg
岩石艺术 Blog 美国

The website of Peter Faris of the Colorado Rock Art Association (Archivist/Publications/and former president). "I began studying rock art back in 1979... I am particularly interested in using clues within the rock art, the culture, and its mythology, to attempt interpretations of meaning." DISCUSSION FORUM
tn_image002crop.jpg

在边缘形成的几个小组
国际

In the past several years not only have researchers battling suppression questioned the objectivity behind mainstream science and anthropology but so has an increasingly Internet-savvy general public. Online researchers are less inclined to simply trust science once they realize that a single ideology rather than scientific objectivity has been driving interpretations of evidence in areas as important as human origins or human prehistory. Prior to the Internet, the peer review system in anthropology so effectively blocked conflicting data from publication that the general public had no way of knowing that conflicting data even existed; it believed that mainstream science was giving them a true and balanced interpretation of all known evidence. However, the Internet has changed everything; more people are privy to the fact that dissenting evidence—awareness of which is an absolutely crucial part of critical thinking and objectivity—is being withheld in anthropology while selected evidence is being presented as unchallenged and in the context of what is increasingly being recognized as a belief system or worldview. As a response, more and more people have joined together to form discussion groups to weigh out the evidence for themselves, express doubts, and otherwise openly challenge proclemations in anthropology presented as science that would never pass as science in any other field. This page will contain links to various such groups. Btw, it should make no difference to readers whether these groups are motivated by science alone (if even possible) or contain members whose concerns are colored by religions or philosophies. Nor should it matter if some postings are emotional. What matters, and what skeptics should pay attention to, is that these groups have mounting impirical reasons to doubt the veracity and objectivity of what is presented to them as fact by mainstream science. In one way or another, groups of this nature support a premise of the Pleistocene Coalition that mainstream scientific behaviors such as suppression of conflicting data need to be fought, that is, unless we are all content to become puppets of an international belief system presented as science yet which is somehow immune to the standard scientific requirement of testability in real time. IMPORTANT NOTE: Most of these groups feature regular contributions by mainstream scientists in university positions though these contributors, for obvious reasons, often write under the safety of anonimity via avatar or nicknames. It is likely that many of these scholars will come out publicly when the paradigm changes and the evidence starts to be considered in an equitable manner.
ist2_1699174-brass-scales-3d-concept-isolated-on-white.jpg
发现在上下文t 美国

Oftentimes, the history behind great discoveries is just as informative and intriguing as the discoveries themselves. This is especially the case when the discoveries in question challenge the standard paradigms of mainstream science. Learn some of these fascinating stories right here from Patrick Lyons, BA, BS, MBA. One may discover that the value scientists place on various artifacts or archaeological sites often has as much to do with their belief systems as it does with the actual data.
tn_image001.jpg
Jörn Greve 德国

Jörn Greve, PD, MD, neurologist, author "Pre-Symbolic Interaction and the Palaeo-Ecology of Religion."
tn_Range_of_Homo_neanderthalensis.png
Neanderthal range in Europe and the Middle East charted by Ryulang
Gerhard Neuhäuser 德国

Department of Pediatrics, Neurology (retired), Justus-Liebig-University in Giessen. Head of Child Neurology and Social Pediatrics, 1978-2001. Professor Neuhauser is especially interested in developmental problems and neurobiology of behavior.


New: Article by Jörn Greve and Gerhard Neuhäuser, Diversity not Darwinism
Syndrome-Gerhard-Neuhauser.jpg
Beth McCormack 美国

Beth McCormack's background and interests are diverse. She did her dissertation (M.A. Univ. of Reading, UK) on altered states of consciousness and is interested in Lower Palaeolithic societies as well as exploring the union of art and science. McCormack has studied data from Lower Palaeolithic sites such as Bilzingsleben and applied ideas formulated by those studies to the prehistoric passage graves of Wales and Ireland. Also influencing McCormack's approach to archaeology is a strong background in music. She is currently studying Neanderthal musical culture. McCormack is project manager and editor for a U. S. archaeological company.

tn_b-mccormack-masters-fig20(shee-twohig).jpg
Lutz Fiedler Germany

State archaeologist, Hessen, Germany. Fiedler is the discoverer of the early Stone Age (Acheulian) figurine known as the "Venus of Tan-Tan" which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of sculpture in archaeology. It was found
during excavations on the north bank of the River Draa in Morocco right next to Acheulian handaxes between undisturbed layers dated 300,000-500,000 years old.

New: Article by Jörn Greve and Lutz Fiedler, Does symbolism represent progress?
New: Article by Lutz Fiedler in Pleistocene Coalition News coming May-June 2010.
tn_000_Makuyuni66%[Lutz-fig-fromJorn4-8-10]cropped&grayscaled-h600.jpg
巴比伦塔黎明 美国

The website of Edmund Blair Bolles, author of Einstein Defiant, Galileo's Commandment, and The Ice Finders: How a Poet, a Professor, and a Politician Discovered the Ice Age. Babel's Dawn is a highly-rated blog about the origins of speech. DISCUSSION FORUM
tn_babel's-dawn_pictureheading.jpg
Adrienne Mayor 美国

Author of Fossil Legends of the First Americans, The First Fossil Hunters, and many other publications including military history. Mayor's broad-scoped research has been featured on NPR, the BBC, and the History Channel as well as in The New York Times and National Geographic. In addition to researching classcial Greek and Roman literature, Mayor also writes about other "'pre-scientific' myths" and "parallels to modern scientific methods."
tn_adrienne-mayor_fossil-legends.jpg





当前链接是对更新纪联合新闻文章


Carl L. Johanessen
Tony Mitton
Neil Steede

Carrie Malde
Gerhard Neuhäuser
Peter Faris

Thomas Bargatzky
Lee Laughlin
David Campbell
Richard Dullum
Virginia Steen-McIntyre
Lutz Fiedler
Laura Lyons
Jim Harrod
Tom Baldwin
Jean Raab
John Feliks




- 更新纪联合新闻发布早先 -


tn_oct2009frontpage-thumbnail.jpg
Issue 1

Patrick Lyons
Virginia Steen-McIntyre
David Campbell
Ishtar
Alan Cannell
John Feliks
tn_november-december2009.jpg
Issue 2

Jörn Greve
Gerhard Neuhäuser
Lutz Fiedler

Peter Faris
Patrick Lyons
Beth McCormack
David Campbell
Laura Lyons
Virginia Steen-McIntyre
Ishtar
tn_jan-feb2010frontpage-thumbnail.jpg
Issue 3

Carl L. Johannessen
Richard Dullum
Tom Baldwin
Jim Harrod
Alan Cannell
Virginia Steen-McIntyre
Ishtar
John Feliks
tn_march-april2010.jpg
Issue 4

Sam VanLandingham
Michael Cremo
Jörn Greve
Gerhard Neuhäuser

Virginia Steen-McIntyre
Alan Cannell
Peter Faris
Richard Dullum






-
很快来! 更新纪联合美术画廊 -




更新世的联合是一个小组研究员和学者挑战对主流科学议程; 尽管经验数据相反,这些主流科学议程由欺骗,镇压和威逼被促进。


更新世的联合的视觉是充分地国际在与很快将是可利用的在许多语言的主页的范围。
tn_bilzingsleben-tony-mitton09[jfcrop].jpgtn_peking-man_tony-mitton09[jfcrop1_2views-flipped].jpg

如果您出版了是根据更新世联合原则或想要的工作加入我们我们的挑战的请与网站经理联系,
约翰Feliks (用鼠标右键单击)

-
为旅途做准备入您未曾知道存在的世界 -

© 
更新世的联合2009

最近更新2010年6月17日。